Monday, February 28, 2011

Key Meetings, February 28-March 4, 2011

Monday, February 28--Regular Senate Finance Committee POSTPONED to Friday.

Wednesday, March 2--University Strategic Planning process begins with an all-day visioning session. Senators and ULC members are invited, as are a representative sampling from the NLU community, including faculty, administrators, staff, BOT members, alums, and students, as well as members of the strategic planning team.

Friday, March 4, 9 AM--Senate Finance Committee. Teleconference only. Contact Andre Guerra for attendance information.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Budget, Finances, and Load

Administration has begun meeting with budget heads this week to begin making specific plans for the 2011 budget. These meetings follow on the planning meetings administration held in fall quarter, in which budget heads examined possible ways to cut 10 percent from their budgets.

The planning in December was responsive to actual results for the first 6 months of the year. As you know, we are further along, and now have close-to-actual results for Winter to add to the mix, as well as projections for Springs. All indications are that the shortfall for the year will be greater than we thought in November and December.

Your leaders in Senate are working with Administration to ensure that the Administration works fairly, appropriately, and with the best interests of the faculty and students in mind. We are also working to ensure that everyone follows the appropriate rules, procedures, and norms of our policies and the principles of constitutional and shared governance, and of the AAUP.


Meetings a Go-Go! (And a Gone-Gone!)

Several faculty have asked me about why the ULC meeting was cancelled for this month. Actually, ULC will have a strategic planning meeting next week, so this week's meeting is cancelled. It's just too many meetings.

ULC will be focusing on strategic planning in the next few meetings--5 to be exact, and Senate will be meeting with ULC in addition to its regular meetings. These are trying times, and all of us are being pulled in different directions.

In the meantime, Senate is trying to reschedule our March meeting. I have to be away the usual time of the meeting. Given the challenges NLU is facing, March will be a key meeting. I am hoping that the meeting will reschedule for March 3 in the afternoon. It's very hard to find a date when senators and administrators are all available. I will keep everyone posted.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

No Rest for the Weary

This is shaping up as an exceptional year in the life of NLU and the faculty. In addition to dealing with enrollment and the budget, we are working hard to make changes in all areas of the institution, from the calendar project, to the reorganization of the enrollment department, to new leadership in all areas of the university.

In addition, as we work through these immediate changes, we are beginning the process of developing a new longer-range strategic plan.

Faculty have already engaged with two major changes, the inauguration of University Leadership Council and the development of a new Promotion and Tenure policy. ULC has the potential of completely changing the way faculty and administration interact, both within ULC and within current structures. All stakeholders (faculty, staff, administration, and even students) need to hold one another, and themselves, accountable that they are following the principles of shared governance.

The new Promotion and Tenure Policy has the potential of transforming NLU in the long run and short term, especially as many of our senior colleagues retire in the next few years. The higher expectations for scholarship, research, and inquiry will deepen our institutional commitment to scholarship, while the provisions of community engagement will ensure that we continue to serve the communities we value.

All of this being said, more work is facing the faculty, in particular. A Senate Task Force is working to improve and simplify the academic planning process. Improvements contemplated in the changes include a complete revamp and simplification of the program review process and a completely new academic planning process that integrates all stakeholders in the university in a procedure that will encourage innovative new programs that drive substantial enrollment.

Moreover, we as a faculty need to engage effectively in the process that is creating next year's budget. Issues such as load, class size, and appropriate faculty assignments will be vital as we move forward.

Faculty Senate and its committees are readying themselves for these task in the next few months. This is going to be a very challenging period of time, and the Senate is looking to the faculty for its support as we work to represent you.


Saturday, February 19, 2011

Senate Highlights, February 2011

I am happy to let you know that Senate unanimously approved the Proposed New Promotion and Tenure Policy. To update everyone, after the Drafting Subcommittee finalized the draft following the Special Meeting, we reviewed all changes with the administration. All changes proposed by the Drafting Subcommittee were accepted, and the draft was forwarded to all Senators and faculty prior to the Senate meeting for their review. We should all congratulate ourselves for a job well done. I believe that the quality of our policy is an attestation of the hard work of the Faculty Task Force, which I would like to acknowledge again in these highlights.

Senate would also like to thank Vice Provost Kathleen Walsh and President Nivine Megahed for their invaluable contributions, their willingness to engage and consider all viewpoints thoughtfully, and their high standards of excellence. Senate owes gratitude to the NCE and CAS faculty, and their chairs, for allowing us to use part of their meeting times in order to hold the Faculty Association meeting in a timely and efficient manner. Senate also thanks Dr. Tom Heaney for acting as chair during a portion of the Faculty Association meeting. Of course, Senate also thanks the faculty for its high attendance, active participation at the meeting and throughout the whole process, and deep interest in ensuring that this policy is fair and appropriate.

NLU's new provost, Dr. Christine Quinn, was warmly welcomed by Senate. Dr. Quinn has been getting to know NLU and the faculty even before coming here, and commented positively on meetings she held with groups of faculty last month. Dr. Quinn and Dr. Megahed will oversee the strategic planning process, which will begin with an all-day retreat on March 2. Senate will be invited to participate in this event as will ULC.

Vice Provost Kathy Walsh reported that the Chicago area commencement will take place at the Arie Crown Theater. There will be two ceremonies, one undergraduate and one graduate. Vice Provost Walsh believes that the faculty will be seated on the stage for our graduates' special day. Dr. Claudia Pitts will represent faculty on the Commencement Committee.

Senators brought up the faculty concern that recently some policy changes have been made without any faculty consultation. Provost Quinn indicated that this issue had been brought up during the campus road shows and, as an issue, will be addressed.

Vice President for Finance and Administration Kent Kay reported that the university continues to anticipate losses for the winter quarter and the entire year. Mr. Kay and Marty Mickey are working with budget heads to draft their proposals for next fiscal year's budget. Mr. Kay also reported that the renovation of the second floor of the Chicago campus will begin in May and is projected to end in November. The atrium, therefore, will not be available for events during that time. Architectural drawings of the improvements will be presented to the community when they are available. This renovation is paid for by funds from the state awarded to the university.

Senate passed a revised English language proficiency requirement for admission. NLU will now accept scores from standardized assessments such as TOEFL and IELTS for admission. Dr Carol Melnick informed Senate that administration will be bringing a number of new academic policy changes to Senate and its committee in the near future, including a review of all admission requirements to undergraduate programs. Senate indicated that it will support fast, efficient review of these changes by appropriate faculty committees and faculty members within the programs. The purpose of the review is to make the requirements as uniform as possible to facilitate the work of the enrollment and admissions groups, without eliminating necessary requirements for individual programs or departments.

Faculty Welfare and Compensation committee reported that it is working on ensuring a fair transition to the new credit hour system as it rolls out. Senate is seeking a representative from Senate Curriculum Committee to serve on the calendar conversion project. FWCC and the Senate chair will continue to work with administration to ensure that policies that affect faculty welfare and compensation are brought forward to the committee appropriately. The Senate Chair and past chair will be particularly proactive to ensure that there will be no surprise announcements that grow out of the run-up to the Board of Trustees meeting. FWCC will also begin to consider discrepancies in salary between newly hired faculty and faculty who have been her for many years.

These highlights are provided as an informal update to faculty, and do not replace the official approved minutes, which will be forwarded to all faculty in the emailed version of these highlights. Minutes from the Special Faculty Association Meeting and the September Faculty Association Meeting will be approved at the Spring Faculty Association meeting.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Senate Passes Promotion and Tenure Policy

Thanks to the hard work of two Senate Task Forces, the Senate, and the input of countless faculty members who participated in surveys, came to meetings, spoke at faculty association or college meetings, the new, proposed Promotion and Tenure Policy passed unanimously at Senate today.

Promotion and Tenure Task Force Members

Bruce Boyer

Sherri Bressman

Mark Burnette

Scipio Colin,

Paula Jordan

Judy Kent

Claudia Miller

Rene Roy

Barbara Scheidt

Todd Price,Chair, 2009-2010

Susan McMahon, Chair 2010-2011

Senate Members 2010-2011

Sophie Degener

Nancy Harding

David Hoogakker

Seema Imam

Renee Judd

Rebecca Lake

James Nowotarski

Claudia Pitts

Brian Reynolds

David San Filippo

Kathleen Sheridan

Tim Collins, Chair


Senate owes thanks to two administrators who were invaluable and highly supportive in ensuring that our P&T policy reflects our mission and raises our standards: Vice Provost Kathleen Walsh and President Nivine Megahed.

The full approved text will route with the Senate Highlights.


Monday, February 14, 2011

Key Meetings, February 14-18, 2011

Monday, February 14: Faculty Welfare and Compensation, 1:oo. Teleconference. Ask Linda Gibbons for dial-in information.

Wednesday, February 16: Faculty Senate, 11:00. Chicago room 4025 and teleconference with meeting ID 199099.


Saturday, February 12, 2011

Difficult Choices and Decisions

First, thanks to all faculty who participated in the Special Meeting on last week. It's really gratifying to see such interest and participation from so many faculty members, whether senior or just beginning their NLU careers.

One of the most difficult challenges facing our faculty is responding to the BOT's request to require promotion to associate professor in order to get tenure. This request has provoked controversy since it was communicated to Senate in fall 0f 2009 by Interim Provost Kathy Walsh.

According to the Task Force chairs, the Task Force engaged extensively on this issue during their year-long research. They discussed it extensively in the first part of their work, and during fall, when they were writing the policy, they talked with many faculty members. According to what the Task Force reported, most faculty they talked to over a period of months accepted the notion of requiring promotion to associate as a requirement for tenure. Therefore, they included it in the policy. Here is a comment from recent email traffic.

[T]hose we interviewed and talked with throughout multiple venues seemed to be fine with the requirement that someone be promoted before tenured, even if this were to occur within the same year. Therefore, the Task Force moved forward on this, making promotion a prerequisite to tenure since the BOT has said they don't understand the justification for why someone is worthy of tenure who had not met the criteria for promotion. This was possible in the past, I think, because the criteria for promotion to associate in the old policy were higher then than that for tenure. This is no longer the case.
Many faculty have wanted to know the reasoning behind the BOT position. Basically, they view tenure as a significant investment in an individual. To them, to merit this level of investment, the candidate needs to demonstrate continual professional growth and achievement. They believe that earning a promotion is an indicator that the candidate has the follow-through and commitment to merit this lifetime guarantee.

The Board of Trustee members also believe that most colleges and universities link tenure and promotion in some way, and that NLU is out of alignment with a fairly standard practice in higher education. As you know, faculty have received conflicting reports about about practices throughout higher education. In a recent email, the chair of the Task Force, Sue McMahon wrote:

Many others of us have also done the research and found that our practice is rare, if not nonexistent elsewhere. Further, the situation that resulted in assistant professors becoming tenured to NLU in the past was not because the policy explicitly supported such a decision. In contrast, the policy was so poorly written that the criteria for becoming an associate professor were higher than for earning tenure. This was genuinely problematic and one issue the Task Force worked hard to address because it created misunderstanding for faculty, P&T committees, administration, and the BOT.

At this point, we are better off avoiding an argument among ourselves on these nuances, and instead seek the best possible P&T Policy we can.

Many faculty have asked me whether we have tried to push back or negotiate on this. I have to report that when I tried, I received the strongest resistance I can recall in any kind of negotiation. One administrator told me that the BOT is "adamant" on this issue.

I don't think that faculty are of one mind on this issue. Obviously, some faculty feel very passionately about this subject, but the TF research over a long period of time showed that many faculty agree with this requirement, which is why they created the policy the way they did.

Senate will carefully consider all feedback from faculty as we finalize this policy and work to obtain the best policy we can.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Meetings, February 7-11, 2011

This week there are several important meetings of interest to all faculty.

Wednesday, February 9 Special Faculty Association Meeting, 9:30 AM Chicago and Wheeling Campuses, teleconference 888-338-6900, Meeting ID 199099. Powerpoints will be projected in both locations. You can teleconference from any location and view Powerpoints at Centra. A Centra meeting invitation will be mailed to all faculty on Monday and updated here.

Wednesday, February 9 NCE and CAS Faculty Meetings, 11:30 AM, Wheeling (NCE) and Chicago (CAS). If you connect remotely, you will need to hang up from the Faculty Association meeting and reconnect to the college meeting.

President's "State of the University" Presentations
Monday, February 7, 10:00 AM, Wheeling Campus & 2:00 PM, North Shore
Wednesday, February 9 1:00 PM,Lisle Campus
Friday, February 11, 10:00 AM,Chicago Campus
Monday, February 14, 2:00 PM, Webinar via Centra for Elgin and Milwaukee, plus anyone unable to attend other sessions.

Thursday, February 10, 2011 Senate Academic Planning Committee, 10 AM, Chicago Campus.